Research overview
The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by
ObjectiveTo investigate the effects of targeting DYNC1I1 in cellular and mouse models of Parkinson's disease (PD).MethodsThe scRNA-seq dataset GSE243639 was analyzed to prioritize autophagy- and transport-related candidate genes in post-mortem substantia nigra samples from patients with PD and controls. SH-SY5Y cells were treated with 1 mM MPP⁺ for 48 h, and male C57BL/6 mice received MPTP at 30 mg/kg/day for 5 consecutive days. DYNC1I1 was silenced with siRNA in cells and targeted with AAV-DYNC1I1 in mice. Autophagic-lysosomal status was evaluated using tandem mCherry-GFP-LC3B fluorescence and autophagy- and lysosome-related markers. Motor performance was assessed using the pole and rotarod tests.ResultsDYNC1I1 was prioritized as a candidate gene on the basis of PD-associated differential expression, overlap with autophagy-related genes, enrichment in a dopaminergic neuron-related subpopulation, and biological relevance to intracellular transport. In MPP⁺-treated cells, DYNC1I1 knockdown reduced α-synuclein accumulation and phosphorylation and improved autophagic-lysosomal marker profiles. In MPTP-treated mice, AAV-DYNC1I1 treatment improved motor performance and TH-positive signal and reduced α-synuclein pathology and autophagic-lysosomal impairment. AAV-DYNC1I1 treatment was also associated with higher p-PI3K/PI3K and p-AKT/AKT ratios.ConclusionsDYNC1I1-targeting interventions attenuated PD-related phenotypes in cellular and mouse models. The observed effects were accompanied by improved autophagic-lysosomal marker profiles and increased PI3K/AKT phosphorylation.
Scientific assessment
Research question
Assess the question within the original study’s scope.
Methods & sample
Check the source article for study design and sample details.
Key findings
An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.
Limitations
Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.
Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.