Research overview
The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by
BackgroundExecutive dysfunction is a common non-motor symptom of Parkinson's disease (PD) and has been linked to dysfunction of the medial frontal cortex (MFC). This randomized, sham-controlled study investigated whether high-definition transcranial alternating current stimulation (HD-tACS) over the MFC could improve executive function in PD.MethodsTwenty-eight PD patients were randomized to receive either active 6-Hz HD-tACS or sham stimulation over the MFC for 10 daily sessions. Executive function was assessed using the Digit Span Test (DST), Trail Making Test (TMT), Verbal Fluency Test (VFT), the Simon task, and the stop-signal task (SST). Functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) was employed to assess prefrontal hemodynamic responses during a separate VFT task.ResultsRelative to sham stimulation, active 6-Hz HD-tACS induced significant improvements in TMT-A, TMT-B, and semantic VFT performance, along with reduced VFT-evoked oxyhemoglobin responses in the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. Baseline-adjusted post-intervention analyses revealed a smaller Simon effect and a higher inhibition rate in the active HD-tACS group. No significant stimulation-specific effects were observed for forward or backward DST, phonemic VFT, or SST reaction time.ConclusionThese findings provide neurobehavioral evidence that 6-Hz HD-tACS over the MFC may selectively improve executive function in PD, highlighting the potential of oscillatory neuromodulation for cognitive rehabilitation.Trial registrationThis trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (No. NCT07240272) on November 20, 2025.
Scientific assessment
Research question
Assess the question within the original study’s scope.
Methods & sample
Check the source article for study design and sample details.
Key findings
An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.
Limitations
Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.
Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.