Research overview
The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by
The primary mechanism and subcellular localisation of α-synuclein toxicity in Parkinson's disease pathogenesis remain unknown. We spatially and temporally resolved proteomic and transcriptomic changes in human iPSC-derived dopaminergic neurons with increasing burden of pathological α-synuclein. We found that misfolded α-synuclein proteoforms, signified by the formation of nanoscale intraneuronal puncta, are associated with impaired translocon function at the endoplasmic reticulum (ER). We show that α-synuclein interacts with Sec61A in iPSC-derived dopaminergic neurons and in post-mortem brain tissue from patients with Parkinson's disease. This interaction interferes with the co-translational translocation of ER-processed proteins including the vacuolar-type ATPase V0a1 subunit, glucocerebrosidase, and Cathepsin B, causing defective organelle function such as reduced lysosomal acidification, leading to increased extracellular vesicle release of α-synuclein. Defective ER-translocation was associated with increased ribosomal UFMylation and proteasomal recruitment but not activation of the unfolded protein response. Reduction of pathological α-synuclein by either CRISPRi to decrease α-synuclein expression or pharmacological activation of proteasomal degradation with repurposed drugs mitigates the ER defect. Our study offers a unifying mechanistic link between α-synuclein pathology and dysregulation of diverse organelle-associated proteins that are both Sec61A translocon substrates and genetic modifiers of Parkinson's disease risk. Our data also provide a therapeutic rationale for proteasomal activation in early Parkinson's disease.
Scientific assessment
Research question
Assess the question within the original study’s scope.
Methods & sample
Check the source article for study design and sample details.
Key findings
An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.
Limitations
Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.
Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.