SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Selective loss of primary cilia and neurotrophic signaling in G51D α-synuclein mice highlights a common pathway to Parkinson's disease.

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A · 2026-08-10

DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2619797123PMID: 42574603

Open accessResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov't; research-article; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

Parkinson's disease is characterized by dopaminergic neuron loss and accumulation of α-synuclein aggregates in the brain. G51D α-synuclein knock-in mice provide a genetically and clinically relevant model of disease, exhibiting early olfactory deficits, age-dependent motor impairment, and progressive phospho-α-synuclein accumulation. In multiple Parkinson's disease models, striatal cholinergic and parvalbumin interneurons, as well as astrocytes, lose primary cilia and the neurotrophic signaling needed to sustain dopaminergic neurons. We show here that G51D α-synuclein mice share these phenotypes. Phospho-Ser129 α-synuclein accumulation correlates with cilia loss in cholinergic interneurons but not in spiny projection neurons that accumulate higher phospho-α-synuclein levels. In the piriform cortex, parvalbumin neurons lose primary cilia and downregulate Neurturin, potentially contributing to olfactory dysfunction. Within the peripheral olfactory epithelium, horizontal basal cells lose cilia, whereas multiciliated olfactory sensory neuron cilia remain intact. These findings reveal convergent cellular vulnerabilities across Parkinson's disease models and highlight a pathogenic role for impaired ciliary signaling.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.