SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

RNA Splicing Dysregulation in Parkinson's Disease.

Genes (Basel) · 2026-07-31

DOI: 10.3390/genes17080911PMID: 42650103

Open accessResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov't; review-article; Review; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

Genetic mutations, altered RNA regulation, and protein aggregation are the main hallmarks of Parkinson's disease (PD), a neurodegenerative disorder. Investigation into the molecular basis of the disease revealed that post-transcriptional regulation, specifically RNA processing, contributes to neuronal vulnerability in PD. Alterations in alternative splicing affecting genes involved in neuronal function and cellular homeostasis have been reported in PD, including SNCA, LRRK2, MAPT, PRKN, and BIN1. These alterations impact central neuronal pathways, including cytoskeletal maintenance, mitochondrial function, synaptic activity, oxidative stress, and intracellular trafficking. This review aims to provide an overview of alternative splicing in key PD gene transcripts, with a focus on their roles in pathogenesis and disease progression. Emerging data suggest that dysregulation of RNA binding proteins (RBPs) may influence RNA processing in PD. We will examine current evidence on the RNA regulatory networks in PD, highlighting the role of transcript isoforms and RBPs in neuronal dysfunction. Finally, we will discuss emerging experimental models such as 3D-brain organoids that offer new opportunities to investigate splicing regulation.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.