SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Theranostic Innovative Strategies for Brain Diseases: New Insights on Neurovascular Unit-Associated Pathological Changes in Neurodegenerative Disorders and Aging.

Int J Mol Sci · 2026-08-11

DOI: 10.3390/ijms27167165PMID: 42653169

Open accessreview-article; Review; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

Central nervous system (CNS) disorders represent a significant healthcare challenge, with aging as the primary risk factor. Current clinical management remains predominantly symptomatic, as late-stage diagnosis and the blood-brain barrier (BBB) limit therapeutic efficacy. This review synthesizes emerging innovations in neurotheranostics-integrated diagnostic and therapeutic platforms-focusing on the neurovascular unit (NVU) as a central pathogenic driver and target. Evidence indicates that NVU and BBB dysfunction are early events in Alzheimer's, Parkinson's, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, and Huntington's diseases, often preceding classic neuropathological hallmarks. The review highlights the potential of nanotechnology, engineered nanoparticles (NPs) and microRNAs (miRNAs) as precision tools for early detection and targeted CNS delivery. Additionally, it discusses the transformative impact of artificial intelligence (AI) in facilitating personalized, predictive care. Transitioning from a generic "one-pill-for-one-disease" model to a patient-centered strategy targeting early NVU alterations is essential. Integrating AI, nanotechnology and NVU-focused strategies offers a promising path toward effective, personalized disease-modifying therapies.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.