NeuralCipher Research overview
The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by
Ultraviolet radiation exhibits a complex, often contradictory link to neurodegeneration risk/progression, spanning clinically diagnosed diseases [Parkinson's Disease (PD), Alzheimer's Disease (AD), Multiple Sclerosis (MS) and Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS)] or intermediate phenotypes (decreased neurogenesis, loss of hippocampal volume). The aim of this review is to highlight the dual impact of UV radiation by collecting and synthesizing experimental (preclinical and translational) evidence as well as epidemiological evidence. Current literature exhibits a clear dichotomy: while Vitamin D is capable of exerting a potent neuroprotective effect via anti-oxidant and anti-inflammatory pathways, chronic and intense UV radiation exposure actually hastens the progression or even drives neurodegeneration via a variety of mechanisms. UV radiation exerts its effects through various interconnected pathways: DNA damage pathways, ROS mediated pathways, vitamin D signaling and the skin-brain axis, which unifies both protective and degenerative effects of UV radiation. Owing to the increasing occurrence of neurodegenerative diseases in the general population, these pathways and mechanisms must be leveraged in future research to develop novel therapeutic and preventive strategies. Investigation of biomarkers linked to certain genetic and environmental factors that could provide a link to predisposition toward neurodegeneration and standardization of UV radiation dosimetry (exposure dose/duration) across experimental or pre-clinical studies must also be prioritized.
Scientific assessment
Research question
Assess the question within the original study’s scope.
Methods & sample
Check the source article for study design and sample details.
Key findings
An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.
Limitations
Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.
Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.