SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Symptom-based classification of Parkinson's disease using retrospective electronic medical records: A STROBE-compliant cross-sectional study.

Medicine (Baltimore) · 2026-09-01

DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000050608PMID: 42760709

Open accessresearch-article; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

This cross-sectional study of electronic medical records (EMRs) was conducted to investigate symptom patterns associated with Parkinson's disease (PD) duration and severity and to explore a symptom-based classification of PD. Data from 334 patients with idiopathic PD who visited a single hospital in South Korea between 2011 and 2021, were used to extract a range of PD-associated symptoms and traditional East-Asian medicine (TEAM) symptoms. Frequency analysis was performed to identify key clinical symptoms by PD progression and severity. Patients with moderate disease severity exhibited different symptom patterns across disease-duration categories, including differences in dyskinesia, speech disorder, floating pulse, and yellow tongue coating. Hierarchical clustering based on PD-related and traditional East Asian medicine symptoms identified 5 distinct EMR-based subtypes. EMR subtype 1 was characterized by the mildest disease severity and shortest disease duration, whereas the remaining subtypes showed distinct symptom profiles and a generally greater overall symptom burden. This information may be useful for identifying clinically distinguishable EMR-based PD subtypes and symptom patterns associated with disease duration and severity. These preliminary findings provide a basis for future studies investigating whether such patterns may inform individualized approaches to PD management.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.