SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Disease Duration Differentiates Freezing of Gait Response to Subthalamic and Nigral Stimulation for Parkinson's Disease in an Exploratory Multicenter Controlled Trial.

Mov Disord Clin Pract · 2026-10-12

DOI: 10.1002/mdc3.70813PMID: 42860886

Check source for accessJournal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

BackgroundFreezing of gait (FoG) belongs to most pressing unmet symptoms in the treatment of Parkinson's disease.ObjectivesTo explore whether combined subthalamic and nigral (STN + SNr) deep brain stimulation improves FoG compared with optimized STN stimulation alone; to identify clinical variables associated with therapeutic response.MethodsIn this exploratory multicenter randomized controlled double-blind trial, we recruited patients from our existing cohorts and randomized them 1:1 to STN or STN + SNr. After baseline, patients were followed with close interim visits (visits 1-5) for 90 days (visit 6). The Freezing of Gait Assessment Course (FoG-AC) was the primary endpoint and was evaluated at P ResultsAt V6, STN (n = 23) and STN + SNr (n = 22) FoG-AC outcomes did not differ significantly. We identified responders with clinically meaningful FoG improvement in both the STN (n = 7) and STN + SNr (n = 8) groups. In STN + SNr responders, mean disease duration was ~12 years, which was ~4.5 years shorter than in non-responders, but there were no differences in motor and cognitive functions. Treatment dynamics suggested that FoG responders improved slowly and gradually. The STN + SNr responder group showed numerically stronger FoG improvement compared with STN responders. Additionally, 15 STN compared to 10 STN + SNr patients wished to change treatment after the RCT phase and before unblinding. Both STN and STN + SNr treatment was safe.ConclusionsFuture trials evaluating adjunctive STN + SNr stimulation should stratify patients by disease duration to optimize outcomes.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.