SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Mesenchymal stromal cells in age-related neurodegenerative disorders: mechanisms, translational barriers, and precision strategies.

Front Immunol · 2026-09-28

DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2026.1965598PMID: 42865955

Check source for accessReview; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

Ageing remodels the neuroimmune, metabolic, and vascular environment in ways that accelerate neuronal vulnerability and constrain tissue repair. Mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) and MSC-derived extracellular vesicles (MSC-EVs) are therefore attractive candidates for neurodegenerative disorders because their effects extend beyond cell replacement to coordinated paracrine, immunomodulatory, trophic, and vascular regulation. This critical review evaluates the biological rationale, disease-specific evidence, translational limitations, and precision-development strategies for MSC-based interventions in Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease, Huntington's disease, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, multiple system atrophy, and vascular dementia, whilst using selected rare hereditary neurodegenerative disorders as exploratory boundary cases. Current evidence supports three interconnected modes of action: reprogramming maladaptive neuroimmune responses; preserving neuronal homeostasis through trophic support, mitochondrial rescue, and proteostasis regulation; and restoring the neurovascular unit and blood-brain barrier. However, reproducible clinical efficacy remains limited by variation in tissue source, donor age, manufacturing, potency, dose, route, and outcome selection, as well as poor central nervous system exposure and inadequate patient stratification. Ageing-related changes in both the recipient microenvironment and the cellular product further complicate translation. Future development should replace empirical cell administration with mechanism-defined products, validated potency assays, quantitative biodistribution, biomarker-guided enrolment, engineered cells or vesicles, rational combinations, and trials using disease-modifying endpoints. MSC-based therapies are best positioned not as universal regenerative agents, but as mechanism-defined, biomarker-matched products-potentially engineered at the cell or EV level-that regulate biologically active and potentially reversible disease states.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.