SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Does depression in Alzheimer's disease show evidence of differential gene expression in neurons or microglia compared to Alzheimer's disease without depression?

J Alzheimers Dis Rep · 2026-01-01

DOI: 10.1177/25424823261472076PMID: 42877303

Check source for accessJournal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

BackgroundDepression in Alzheimer's disease (AD) is common, distressing, difficult to treat and inadequately understood.ObjectiveWe compared gene expression in neurons and microglia from AD patients +/- depression, stratified according to depression polygenic risk score (PRS-D) and looked for differential pathway regulation.MethodsWe identified AD patients with (n = 95) or without depression (n = 25) whose brains had been donated to a UK brain bank. Exclusion criteria included other disorders known to affect cognition, previous major psychiatric disorder and a neuropathological diagnosis of a non-AD dementia. Depression was defined as a clinical depression diagnosis or Geriatric Depression Scale/Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale >7. PRS-D was calculated using LDpred2. In the AD + depression group, only the top (n = 29) and bottom tertile (n = 30) of PRS-D were analyzed by microarray. Tissue from superior frontal gyrus (SFG) and anterior insula (AIns) was sorted into neuronal and microglial fractions, and gene expression measured using a ClariomS Pico microarray.ResultsAfter quality control, microarray data were available for AIns microglia (n = 51), AIns neurons (n = 59), SFG microglia (n = 60) and SFG neurons (n = 63). No individual genes had a p ConclusionsIn conclusion we have identified pathways that may contribute to the development of depression in AD. A majority were identified predominantly in microglia.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.