SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · PPR

Neuro-BOTs: Biologically-Informed Transformers for Brain Imaging Analysis

· 2025-08-20

DOI: 10.20944/preprints202506.0858.v2

Check source for accessPreprintOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

Transformer models have reshaped natural language processing by using attention mechanisms to model relationships across sequences. Here, we adapt this architecture to brain imaging with Neurobiologically-Optimized Transformers (Neuro-BOTs)—a framework that embeds prior neurobiological knowledge directly into the model's attention layers. Rather than learning attention weights solely from data, Neuro-BOTs incorporate fixed spatial filters derived from brain maps—such as neurotransmitter distributions, mitochondrial density, or anatomical connectivity. These priors guide how the model attends to functional MRI features across brain regions. We evaluate Neuro-BOTs on three classification tasks using resting-state fMRI. In a Parkinson’s disease dataset, incorporating a noradrenergic filter improves classification accuracy from 71.3% to 89.7%, suggesting that early-stage noradrenergic dysfunction is a key discriminative signal. To assess specificity, we test the model on healthy ageing datasets—where no single biological system should dominate—and find no spurious performance gains across diverse filters and configurations. To assess sensitivity, we apply the model to two small datasets measuring LSD-induced brain responses where we hypothesised knowledge about the pharmacological profile of the drug (serotonergic priors) would improve classification despite limited sample size. These results show that embedding biologically meaningful priors into Transformer architectures enhances both accuracy and interpretability across a wide range of contexts and applications. More broadly, Neuro-BOTs provide a principled way to integrate multiscale brain knowledge into deep learning models, enabling new forms of biologically grounded inference in clinical prediction and cross-species translation.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.