SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · PPR

Fc-modified IVIG with enhanced blood-brain barrier penetration ameliorates cognitive deficits and neuropathology in A53T α-synuclein transgenic mice

· 2025-09-04

DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-7354381/v1

Check source for accessPreprintOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

Abstract Parkinson’s disease (PD) is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder characterized by α-synuclein (α-syn) aggregation, neuroinflammation, and oxidative stress. Although intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) contains naturally occurring antibodies against α-syn oligomers, it has failed to demonstrate therapeutic efficacy in PD models, likely due to limited delivery across the blood-brain barrier (BBB). Enhancing BBB penetration of IVIG could therefore substantially improve its therapeutic potential in PD. Here, we developed a brain-targeted IVIG formulation (IVIGᴬ) by site-specifically conjugating Angiopep-2 (Ang-2) to the Fc glycan site (Asn297) of IVIG, enabling receptor-mediated transcytosis across the BBB via low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein-1 (LRP1). Compared with unmodified IVIG, IVIGᴬ exhibited significantly enhanced brain accumulation. Moreover, systemic administration of IVIGᴬ markedly improved motor and cognitive performance in A53T α-syn transgenic mice by reducing phosphorylated α-syn aggregates, preserving dopaminergic neurons and synaptic integrity, and attenuating neuroinflammation, oxidative stress, and complement activation. These findings suggest that IVIGᴬ represents a promising immunotherapeutic agent with translational potential for the treatment of PD and other neurodegenerative disorders.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.