SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · PPR

MRI-Based Quantitative Assessment of Normal-Appearing White And Grey Matter Demyelination in Multiple Sclerosis, Parkinson’s Disease, Long COVID, and Normal Aging

· 2025-12-15

DOI: 10.20944/preprints202512.1296.v1

Check source for accessPreprintOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

Normal-appearing white (WM) and grey (GM) matter outside focal demyelinating lesions (WMH) has been found impaired in many diseases and normal aging. The present study aimed to compare global GM and WM alterations in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS), Parkinson's disease, long COVID (LC) and normal aging. The study population comprised 196 participants including patients with MS (n=42), PD (n = 16), LC (n = 75), and age- and gender-matched controls selected from healthy volunteers (n = 63). All participants underwent MR scanning using the fast macromolecular fraction (MPF) mapping protocol and routine clinical sequences. MPF in global normal-appearing WM, GM, and mixed WM-GM was measured after exclusion of segmented focal lesions. Significant WMH volume increase and MPF decrease in global WM, WM-GM, and GM were found both in normal aging and MS, PD, and LC patients (except for WM in PD patients). The greatest MPF decrease was observed in MS patients. Both MS, PD, LC patients and the oldest (75-85 years) controls had significant demyelination in global GM. Among LC patients, the greatest global MPF reduction was found in patients with depression and insomnia as COVID-19 complications. In healthy controls, the peak age of myelination was estimated as 42.2 years for WM, 46.5 years for WM-GM, and 45.4 years for GM. MPF mapping showed high sensitivity to age-related and disease-related changes in brain myelination, particularly in GM. Our results confirm the feasibility of using MPF mapping in large-scale clinical studies.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.