SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · PPR

Amyloid-β, Tau Protein, α-Synuclein, TDP-43, and FUS in Mixed Pathology: And Intrinsic Disorder to Rule Them All

· 2026-03-23

DOI: 10.20944/preprints202601.2145.v2

Check source for accessPreprintOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

Neurodegenerative diseases, including Alzheimer's Disease (AD), Parkinson's Disease (PD), Lewy Body Disease (LBD), and related dementias, represents a global health challenge, particularly in aging populations. The simultaneous occurrence of neurodegenerative diseases in an aging population suggests a potential link between causative proteins. Such neurodegenerative proteins, including amyloid-β (Aβ), τ-protein (tau), α‑synuclein, TAR DNA-binding protein 43 (TDP-43), and Fused in Sarcoma (FUS), share key characteristics of intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs), which can explain promiscuous physical interactions, cross-seeding, co-occurrence, pathological synergy, and shared upstream and downstream mechanisms. This review synthesizes current evidence on (1) shared biophysical features of neurodegeneration-associated proteins, (2) mechanisms driving mixed neuropathology, (3) therapeutic implications of disorder-driven interactions, and (4) key unresolved questions shaping future research. By framing neurodegeneration as a network of interacting, disorder-driven proteinopathies rather than isolated entities, this perspective highlights the need for integrative, systems-level approaches to better understand disease heterogeneity and to identify novel targets for intervention.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.