SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · PPR

Educational effectiveness of multimedia scenarios in problem-based learning: a three-year comparative study among Japanese medical students

· 2026-05-14

DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-8516677/v1

Check source for accessPreprintOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

Abstract Background Problem-based learning (PBL) traditionally relies on text-based scenarios, but students often find it difficult to fully understand patient conditions on the basis of text alone. In this study, the educational effectiveness levels of multimedia and text-based PBL scenarios were compared in terms of improving students’ understanding of patient conditions and their ability to identify differential diagnoses. Methods From 2021 to 2023, third-year medical students at Nihon University School of Medicine participated in PBL sessions featuring three diseases, namely, Parkinson’s disease, lung cancer, and hypersensitivity pneumonitis, using either text-based or multimedia scenarios. Multimedia elements included medical interview videos, auscultation sounds, and computed tomography (CT) imaging videos. The participants included 121 students in 2021, 112 in 2022, and 114 in 2023. After each PBL session, the students completed a survey and submitted a report, which were analysed and categorized into the following three learning themes: symptoms, physical and diagnostic findings, and differential diagnoses. Results In the Parkinson’s disease scenario, which entailed the presentation of visible symptoms such as tremors and gait abnormalities, 83% of the students reported that they could understand the patient’s condition, significantly more than for lung cancer (58%) or hypersensitivity pneumonitis (53%). Introducing multimedia elements such as auscultation sounds and CT imaging videos significantly increased the proportion of students who explored differential diagnoses in treating lung cancer (p 

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.