SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · PPR

State-Space Compression Enables Desktop-Scale Hit Discovery for Intrinsically Disordered α-Synuclein

· 2026-06-23

DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-10102247/v1

Check source for accessPreprintOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

Abstract The accessible chemical space dwarfs any tractable screening budget, and most artificial intelligence drug discovery pipelines respond by docking and ranking a small sublibrary. The resulting hit list is agnostic to selectivity, brain penetration, toxicity, synthetic accessibility, and chemical novelty. We present ISTP-DPISO DrugEngine, an end-to-end engine developed by ISTP Tech that integrates the Local Information Criticality Principle (LICP) with a Discrete Phase-Interference Search Operator (DPISO). We demonstrate the engine on the intrinsically disordered protein (IDP) α-synuclein, whose non-amyloid-component (NAC, residues 61–95) drives Parkinson-associated aggregation. The resulting LICP active set focuses the expensive LICP‑DPISO scoring: in a production‑scale run, the engine compressed a ~ 8.46×10⁸‑molecule mirror to a 10,000,000‑molecule active set (~ 85‑fold) before scoring, then converged to a compact, safety‑gated shortlist plus de novo designs. The entire campaign ran on a single desktop workstation, without any high‑performance‑computing cluster. Three engine‑prioritized, commercially available candidates (2‑D08, Uralenol, Herbacetin) and an (−)-epigallocatechin gallate (EGCG) positive control were then tested in a thioflavin‑T (ThT) aggregation assay at 100 µM: all three engine‑nominated candidates suppressed α‑synuclein aggregation, giving perfect prospective inhibitor‑call concordance (3/3 nominated); together with the EGCG positive control, all four assayed compounds inhibited aggregation (4/4 total), two by ≥ 80% plateau reduction. ISTP‑DPISO DrugEngine reframes virtual screening from post‑hoc score fusion to a single, state‑space‑compressed, safety‑gated, experimentally validated discovery pipeline.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.