SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · PPR

Large-scale functional annotation establishes a reference framework for human <i>LRRK2</i> variants

· 2026-06-26

DOI: 10.64898/2026.06.17.26355034

Check source for accessPreprintOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

Pathogenic variants in leucine-rich repeat kinase 2 ( LRRK2 ) 1 are among the most frequent monogenic causes of Parkinson’s disease (PD) 2 and act through a gain-of-function mechanism of increased kinase activity. LRRK2 -targeted therapies are in clinical development, but interpretation of the rapidly expanding catalogue of rare LRRK2 variants remains a barrier to translation. Here, we present functionally annotated data on >350 LRRK2 coding variants using a standardized cellular assay with Rab10 phosphorylation as a readout of kinase activity and integrated these data with curated genetic and clinical annotations from the Movement Disorders Society Genetic Mutation Database (MDSGene). Variants differed in activation magnitude, ranging from modest increases (e.g., p.G2019S) to strongly activating substitutions such as p.Y1699C or p.L1795F. Activating variants occurred across the full length of LRRK2, although the largest effects clustered within the ROC–COR regulatory hub, where structural analysis identified subdomains forming an allosteric scaffold controlling kinase output. All known/established pathogenic variants showed increased activity, whereas benign and likely benign variants remained within the wild-type range. Functional effect sizes correlated with pathway activation in patient-derived immune cells, altogether providing a framework for ACMG-based variant interpretation in which kinase activation can support PS3 functional evidence for reclassification of variants.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.