SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · PPR

Consistency of Serial CSF alpha-Synuclein Seed Amplification Assay Results in the Parkinson’s Progression Marker Initiative

· 2026-04-03

DOI: 10.64898/2026.04.01.26349969

Open accessPreprintOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

Studies reporting alpha-synuclein seed amplification assay (aSyn-SAA) results are often cross-sectional. Here we investigated the intra-individual consistency of aSyn-SAA results over time from participants in the Parkinson’s Progression Marker Initiative (PPMI). A total of 1238 participants had >1 CSF aSyn-SAA result for analysis (Parkinson’s disease [PD]=633, prodromal =563, healthy control [HC]=42) which were collected over a median (min, max) of 2.0 (0.4, 11.4) years. Emphasis was placed on evaluating consistency in less common results such as aSyn-SAA- PD participants, aSyn-SAA+ HC and conversion rates from aSyn-SAA negative to positive results prodromal participants. Of aSyn-SAA+ PD participants, 96% (474/493, 95%CI 94-98%) remained positive in subsequent samples, and 92% (116/126, 95%CI 86-96%) of aSyn-SAA- PD participants remained negative. 99% (303/307, 95%CI 97-99%) of aSyn-SAA+ prodromal participants remained positive, and 95% (234/247, 95%CI 91-97%) of aSyn-SAA- prodromal participants remained negative. 89% (16/18, 95%CI 67-97%) of aSyn-SAA+ HC participants remained positive, and 87% (20/23, 95%CI 68-95%) of aSyn-SAA- HC participants remained negative. These results confirm a high consistency of aSyn-SAA results over time, even in less expected results.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.