Research overview
The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by
Background: Parkinson's disease (PD) and gout are common chronic disorders with potentially shared biological mechanisms involving urate metabolism, inflammation, and oxidative stress. However, epidemiological findings remain inconsistent. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the bidirectional association between gout and PD. Methods: A systematic search of PubMed/Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Library was conducted from database inception to January 2026. Observational studies evaluating the association between gout and PD were included. Pooled hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using random-effects models. Statistical significance was defined as p<0.05. The review was prospectively registered in PROSPERO (CRD420261439697). Results: Six cohort studies were included. In pooled analyses, gout was not associated with subsequent PD risk (HR=1.02, 95% CI 0.93–1.12; p=0.70). Sex-stratified analyses also demonstrated no significant associations among women (HR=1.10, 95% CI 0.93–1.30; p=0.27) or men (HR=0.99, 95% CI 0.92–1.07; p=0.79). Evidence regarding the reverse association was limited to a single nationwide cohort study, which reported a lower subsequent risk of gout among individuals with PD (HR=0.51, 95% CI 0.43–0.60; p<0.00001). Similar findings were observed among women (HR=0.56, 95% CI 0.43–0.72) and men (HR=0.47, 95% CI 0.39–0.57). Conclusion: Gout was not associated with subsequent PD risk. Evidence from a single nationwide cohort suggests that PD may be associated with a reduced risk of subsequent gout. Further large-scale prospective studies are needed to clarify the relationship between PD, gout, and urate metabolism.
Scientific assessment
Research question
Assess the question within the original study’s scope.
Methods & sample
Check the source article for study design and sample details.
Key findings
An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.
Limitations
Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.
Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.