Research overview
The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by
The structural diversity of alpha-synuclein amyloid fibrils is closely linked to the pathogenesis of Parkinson’s disease and related synucleinopathies. However, reproducing disease-associated fibril conformations from recombinant full-length protein in vitro has remained challenging. Inspired by successful truncation strategies developed for the Tau protein, we investigated whether removing the disordered terminal regions («fuzzy coat») of alpha-synuclein could bias fibril assembly toward disease-relevant folds. We designed a truncated construct comprising residues 31-100, corresponding to the structured core of patient-derived Parkinson’s disease fibrils, and systematically screened aggregation conditions across a broad range of pH values and ionic environments. Cryo-electron microscopy revealed four previously undescribed fibril structures, including new subtypes of the established type 1 and type 3 polymorphs and a novel fibril fold, termed type 10, which reproducibly formed under acidic conditions. Type 10 was observed as two distinct dimeric assemblies (10A and 10B) that share a common protofilament fold but differ in their inter-filament interfaces. Structural comparison with the patient-derived Parkinson’s disease polymorph revealed local similarities, including conserved β-strand organization and loop conformations within the fibril core, but remains structurally distinct overall. Our results demonstrate that rational construct design combined with systematic environmental screening reshapes the alpha-synuclein polymorphic landscape and promotes structural motifs characteristic of disease-associated fibrils.
Scientific assessment
Research question
Assess the question within the original study’s scope.
Methods & sample
Check the source article for study design and sample details.
Key findings
An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.
Limitations
Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.
Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.