SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · PPR

The chaperone Clusterin participates in α-Synuclein neuropathology in Parkinson’s disease brain

· 2026-08-13

DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-10625001/v1

Check source for accessPreprintOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

Abstract α-Synuclein aggregation and propagation are central pathogenic events in Parkinson’s disease, yet the contribution of molecular chaperones to these processes remains poorly understood. Clusterin, also known as Apolipoprotein J, is a major chaperone implicated in proteostasis and neurodegeneration and has been extensively investigated in Alzheimer’s disease but remains largely unexplored in Parkinson’s disease. In the present cross-sectional study, we aimed to investigate Clusterin distribution and its interplay with α-Synuclein pathology in the midbrain of post-mortem human brains from Parkinson’s disease patients, using complementary biochemical and neuropathological approaches. We found increased levels of secreted Clusterin in the substantia nigra of Parkinson’s disease patients accompanied by impaired microglial Clusterin internalization and clearance. Notably, analyzing Clusterin interplay with α-Synuclein pathology, we revealed a positive correlation between Clusterin levels and α-Synuclein aggregation in Parkinson’s disease and found that both proteins co-localized within pathological inclusions, including Lewy bodies, supporting a close association between Clusterin and α-Synuclein pathology. These findings support a model in which Clusterin may initially act as a protective chaperone response to misfolded α-Synuclein but becomes progressively trapped within Lewy bodies as pathology advances. Together, our results uncover the association between Clusterin dysregulation and α-Synuclein neuropathology and identify Clusterin as a potential mediator of proteostasis failure and a candidate therapeutic target in Parkinson’s disease.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.