SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · PPR

Integrative Meta-GWAS of European and Multi-Ancestry Parkinson’s Disease Studies Refines Genetic Risk Architecture and Prioritizes Unresolved Candidate Loci

· 2026-09-02

DOI: 10.20944/preprints202609.0155.v1

Check source for accessPreprintOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

Parkinson's disease (PD) is a highly polygenic neurodegenerative disorder whose genome-wide association study (GWAS) discoveries have largely arisen from European-ancestry cohorts. We integrated the Nalls et al. European PD GWAS with Kim et al. multi-ancestry summary statistics (GCST90275127), which exclude the Nalls dataset. Both resources were aligned to GRCh37, quality controlled, allele harmonized, and combined by fixed-effect inverse-variance weighting. After quality control, 6,477,357 harmonized variants entered meta-analysis, and 7,085 reached P < 5 × 10⁻⁸. The strongest signals mapped to established PD regions, including SNCA (rs356220; OR = 1.270, P = 6.17 × 10⁻⁸⁶) and GBA (rs2230288; OR = 1.989, P = 4.94 × 10⁻⁵⁸). Stringent locus analysis at P < 5 × 10⁻⁹ using a 1000 Genomes all-ancestry linkage disequilibrium reference identified 357 independent significant variants, 128 lead variants, and 73 genomic risk loci among reference-covered variants. Forty-two loci mapped to pre-Kim regions, three to Kim-published loci, and 28 remained unresolved candidates. Genomic inflation was elevated in the combined statistic (λGC = 1.875 among common non-MHC variants), requiring ancestry-aware calibration. These results refine established PD association architecture and prioritize unresolved loci for independent validation without establishing novel PD loci.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.