Research overview
The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc0
Visual hallucinations (VH) are difficult to treat because pharmacological interventions are only partially effective and associated with many adverse effects. One of the alternative non-pharmacological treatments for VH is repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS). However, identifying optimal stimulation sites for rTMS is challenging. To determine whether a connectivity-based targeting approach based on resting state (rs) fMRI data can be used to identify regions that may serve as effective rTMS targets. We acquired rs-fMRI scans pre-rTMS and post-rTMS in a single patient with retinitis pigmentosa (near blindness), Parkinson’s disease (PD) and had therapy-resistant VH. Rs-fMRI data were analyzed using fast Eigenvector Centrality Mapping (ECM). A target area was selected based on high ECM values and relative accessibility for rTMS. Subsequently, the patient was stimulated with 1 Hz rTMS during 5 days, followed by 30 Hz theta-burst stimulation during another 5 days. Distributions of surrogate and bootstrap data were used to statistically evaluate the effect of rTMS. The bilateral supplementary motor areas (SMA) were selected as rTMS target areas. When pre-rTMS were compared to post-rTMS, different ECM values were found in the SMA, precuneus, occipital pole and hippocampus. Clinical evaluation and follow-up showed that the intensity and frequency of the VH were decreased after rTMS. Our connectivity-based targeting approach applied to rs-fMRI data seems to be successful in identifying an optimal target area for rTMS on a single subject basis. Our results show changes in the connectivity pattern, both in the target area and associated hubs involved in VH pathogenesis.
Scientific assessment
Research question
Assess the question within the original study’s scope.
Methods & sample
Check the source article for study design and sample details.
Key findings
An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.
Limitations
Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.
Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.