SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · PPR

Selegiline Improves Excessive Daytime Sleepiness in Parkinson’s Disease: An Open Trial

· 2021-07-26

DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-708038/v1

Check source for accessPreprintOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

Abstract Excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS) is common in Parkinson’s disease (PD) and may respond to dopaminergic therapies. The aim of this open-label trial was to assess the efficacy and safety of selegiline as a treatment for EDS in PD patients. In this multi-center study, 141 PD subjects were enrolled between December 2019 and October 2020, and 121 patients completed the 8-week study. Selegiline was administered at 5 mg/day in the first week and was increased to 10 mg per day during the following weeks. EDS was evaluated using the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) at baseline, week 3, and week 8. Changes in motor complications, sleep quality, and quality of life were also assessed in patients with PD. As primary outcomes, ESS scores decreased significantly in PD patients who received selegiline for 8 weeks (P P=0.037), while the percentage of patients with dyskinesia and the severity of dyskinesia did not increase significantly compared with baseline. Participants treated with selegiline showed an improvement in EDS and good tolerance of the drug. This study demonstrated the efficacy of selegiline for the treatment of daytime sleepiness in PD patients.Trial registration: clinicaltrials, NCT04870372. Registered 5 May 2021 - Retrospectively registered, https://register.clinicaltrials.gov/prs/app/action/SelectProtocol?sid=S0009J06&selectaction=Edit&uid=U00026CP&ts=2&cx=ruz8uy.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.