SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · PPR

Correlation analysis between 3D and plane DAT binding parameters of 11C-CFT PET/CT and the clinical characteristics of patients with Parkinson's disease

· 2023-04-21

DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-2592706/v1

Check source for accessPreprintOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

Abstract Background: To explore the correlation between dopamine transporter (DAT) PET/CT and the clinical characteristics and the scales of Parkinson’s disease (PD) patients, furthermore explore the scientificity and feasibility of incorporating 3D-dopaminergic binding parameters into the clinical scoring system for PD. Methods: A total of 75 patients with PD were retrospectively included. The clinical characteristics (including age, gender, disease duration), modified Hoehn-Yahr (H-Y) grading, UPDRS (the unified Parkinson's disease rating scale) II & III and Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) of PD patients in corresponding time periods were obtained. DAT binding parameters and their derived parameters based on plane and 3D images in neostriatum were analyzed for the consistency of plane and 3D parameters, and the correlation between the above parameters and the clinical characteristics of patients. Results: The DAT binding parameters based on 3D images had good consistency with the plane parameters (pppppppConclusions: The quantitative parameters based on plane and 3D images of 11C-CFT PET/CT had good consistency, and 3D parameters in neostriatum had a better correlation with the activities of daily living, UPDRS motor score, the severity and duration of disease and cognition than plane parameters in PD patients.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.