SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · PPR

Cognitive profile of reserpine following its repeated administration in rats: a progressive model of memory impairment

· 2023-09-25

DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-3237470/v1

Check source for accessPreprintOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

Abstract Contrary to other animal models for Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and related cognitive deficits involving acute memory impairment, the present study was designed to provide an animal model exhibiting a progressive decrease in memory upon repeated administration of reserpine (0.1 mg/kg). In the present study, reserpine was injected daily (once a day for three weeks). Short- and long-term memories were assessed using a Morris water maze on a weekly basis. A novel object recognition test was performed after completion of the treatment (day 21). Animals were decapitated on day 21, and brain samples were stored at -70°C. Impairment of short- and long-term activities (as monitored in the Morris water maze) was not observed until after the first week. Long-term memory was found to be impaired earlier than short-term memory. The novel object recognition test also revealed reserpine-induced impairment of working memory. Neurochemical analysis of the whole brain samples by HPLC-EC showed that repeated administration of reserpine significantly decreased dopamine (p ‘progressive’ animal model of memory impairment. The results could be beneficial for understanding the pathophysiology of Parkinson’s-related memory impairment.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.