SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · PPR

Diagnostic Accuracy and Predictors of Alpha-Synuclein Accumulation in Gastrointestinal Tract of Parkinson’s disease

· 2024-01-25

DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-3865958/v1

Check source for accessPreprintOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

Abstract Background and objectives This study aimed to determine the possibility as a biomarker and identify predictors of alpha-synuclein (AS) accumulation in the gastrointestinal (GI) tract of patients with Parkinson’s disease (PD). Methods The frequency of AS accumulation in the GI tract was compared between patients with PD (N = 97) who underwent radical GI surgery for cancer and individually matched controls (N = 94). Clinical characteristics were compared between patients with positive (AS+) and negative (AS−) AS accumulation. A multivariable logistic regression analysis was conducted to determine the predictors of AS accumulation in the GI tract of patients with PD. Results The frequency of AS accumulation was significantly higher in patients with PD (75.3%) than in controls (8.5%, p-value p-value = 0.005). Both disease duration and surgical site independently predicted the presence of AS accumulation in the GI tract of patients with PD. Conclusions The results suggest that the stomach is the optimal location for identifying pathological biomarkers using AS accumulation in the GI tract. Our study suggests PD-related AS accumulation in the GI tract follows temporally increasing but spatially static progression pattern.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.