SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · PPR

Co-expression-wide association studies link genetically regulated interactions with complex traits

· 2024-10-04

DOI: 10.1101/2024.10.02.24314813

Check source for accessPreprintOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

Transcriptome- and proteome-wide association studies (TWAS/PWAS) have proven successful in prioritizing genes and proteins whose genetically regulated expression modulates disease risk, but they ignore potential co-expression and interaction effects. To address this limitation, we introduce the co-expressionwide association study (COWAS) method, which can identify pairs of genes or proteins whose genetically regulated co-expression is associated with complex traits. COWAS first trains models to predict expression and co-expression from genetic variation, and then tests for association between imputed co-expression and the trait of interest while also accounting for direct effects from each exposure. We applied our method to plasma proteomic concentrations from the UK Biobank, identifying dozens of interacting protein pairs associated with cholesterol levels, Alzheimer’s disease, and Parkinson’s disease. Notably, our results demonstrate that co-expression between proteins may affect complex traits even if neither protein is detected to influence the trait when considered on its own. We also show how COWAS can help to disentangle direct and interaction effects, providing a richer picture of the molecular networks that mediate genetic effects on disease outcomes.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.