SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · PPR

Molecular analysis of network vulnerability to α-synuclein pathology reveals PAKs as therapeutic targets for Parkinson’s disease

· 2024-10-22

DOI: 10.1101/2024.10.22.619411

Check source for accessPreprintOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

ABSTRACT α-Synuclein misfolding and progressive accumulation drive a pathogenic process in Parkinson’s disease, yet many brain regions develop more or less pathology than would be predicted by connectivity alone, indicating that intrinsic biological factors influence regional vulnerability. Here, we combined whole brain mapping of α-synuclein pathology in wildtype mice 3 days to 9 months after seeding with network diffusion modeling based on anatomical connectivity to derive quantitative measures of regional vulnerability. To identify molecular drivers of this vulnerability, we generated a brain-wide sPAtial Neuron Gene Expression Atlas (PANGEA) and compared regional transcriptional profiles with model-derived vulnerability scores. Vulnerable regions were enriched for specific cellular programs. Specific kinases were also enriched in vulnerable regions, leading to the identification of group II p21-activated kinases (PAKs) as candidate regulators of α-synucleinopathy. Pharmacological inhibition of group II PAKs reduced α-synuclein aggregation and protected against neuron loss in primary neurons, remained effective when administered after pathology initiation, and suppressed pathology in vivo. Consistent with these findings, genetic depletion of PAK5/6 also suppressed α-synuclein aggregation. Together, these results establish a framework linking network-level measures to cellular mechanisms of selective vulnerability and nominate group II PAKs as promising disease-modifying therapeutic targets for Parkinson’s disease.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.