SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · PPR

Smell testing to identify early alpha-synucleinopathy among people with dream enactment behavior

· 2024-12-12

DOI: 10.1101/2024.12.11.24318857

Check source for accessPreprintOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

ABSTRACT Background REM sleep behavior disorder (RBD) is an early manifestation of alpha-synucleinopathy in many cases. Dream enactment behavior (DEB), the clinical hallmark of RBD, has many etiologies and cannot be used alone to predict underlying alpha-synucleinopathy. We compared the proportion of people with alpha-synucleinopathy, as measured by CSF alpha-synuclein seed amplification assay (CSFasynSAA), between people with polysomnographic-confirmed RBD (RBD-PSG) and people who reported DEB on a questionnaire and were further selected with smell testing and DAT-SPECT. Methods Participants were enrolled in the Parkinson’s Progression Marker Initiative (PPMI) and ≥60 years old without a diagnosis of Parkinson’s disease. Participants had either RBD-PSG or self-reported DEB. Self-reported DEB participants had to have hyposmia (Results CSFasynSAA was positive in 171/240 (71%) of RBD-PSG and %) 180/210 (86%) of DEB+Hypos participants. Among RBD-PSG, hyposmia strongly predicted CSFasynSAA+ (PPV: 92% [95% CI 87%-97%]). Smell identification was more accurate than DAT-SPECT in predicting CSFasynSAA+ in RBD-PSG (AUC for UPSIT: 0.89 [95% CI 0.84 – 0.94]; AUC for DAT-SPECT: 0.65 [95% CI 0.58 – 0.73]). Conclusions Smell testing may be an effective and scalable method to identify people with alpha-synucleinopathy among those with self-reported DEB. Among individuals with RBD diagnosed by PSG, smell testing improved prediction of positive CSF alpha-synuclein biomarker.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.