SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · PPR

An Intelligent CDS (Clinical Decision Support) Framework using Machine Learning Algorithms for Parkinson Disease Detection

· 2024-12-17

DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-5418435/v1

Check source for accessPreprintOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

Abstract Parkinson’s disease is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder characterized by the gradual onset of symptoms, complicating early diagnosis. Traditionally, neurologists diagnose Parkinson’s through patient medical history reviews and repeated scans, while body movement analysts focus on evaluating physical movements. Recent studies suggest that speech alterations can serve as quantifiable markers for early Parkinson’s detection. This paper introduces a novel and robust framework that leverages the Multiple Feature Evaluation Approach (MFEA), the Synthetic Minority Oversampling Technique (SMOTE), and Neural Networks for the early detection of Parkinson’s disease. A new algorithm, termed Multi-Agent MFEA, is proposed within this framework, which is further developed into an intelligent system called iCDS (Intelligent Clinical Decision Support). The effectiveness of this system is validated using a speech dataset from the UCI Machine Learning Repository. Comparative analysis shows that the iCDS framework, equipped with MFEA, outperforms traditional feature selection methods (such as Mutual Information Gain and Recursive Feature Elimination) and classifiers (including Naive Bayes, KNN, and SVM) in multiple aspects. The study’s findings have the potential to aid both patients and medical professionals in making timely decisions and improving medical support. The development of Clinical Decision Support (CDS) systems has made early detection of Parkinson’s disease more feasible, and this research substantiates that advancement.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.