SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · PPR

Neuronal alpha-Synuclein Disease stage progression over five years

· 2024-12-23

DOI: 10.1101/2024.12.17.24319172

Check source for accessPreprintOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

ABSTRACT Background Neuronal alpha-Synuclein Disease (NSD) is defined by presence of an in vivo biomarker of neuronal alpha-synuclein (n-asyn) pathology, independent of presence of clinical syndrome. The NSD integrated staging system (NSD-ISS) describes progression across the disease continuum as stages 0 to 6. The objective of this analysis was to assess 5-year longitudinal change in the NSD-ISS. Methods Analysis included a subset of participants from the Parkinson’s Progression Markers Initiative (PPMI) enrolled before 2020 as Parkinson’s disease, prodromal, or healthy controls who met NSD criteria. Staging was defined based on biomarkers of n-asyn and dopaminergic dysfunction in early stages, clinical features (cognition, other non-motor features, and parkinsonism), and increasing degree of functional impairment in stages 3-6. Stages were examined annually for 5 years, along with the determinants of progression and effects of dopaminergic medication. Findings 576 participants were n-asyn positive and included in the analysis. Of these, 494 were enrolled as Parkinson’s disease, 74 as prodromal and 8 as healthy controls. At baseline 56% of participants were in stage 3, 24% stage 2B, 13% stage 4, 4% stage 2A, and Interpretation Our analysis supports the validity of the NSD-ISS in defining stages of disease progression and support the utility of the NSD-ISS as a potential tool to identify clinical trial cohorts for drug development. Further validation in interventional studies is a crucial next step. Funding The Michael J. Fox Foundation for Parkinson’s Research (MJFF).

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.