SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · PPR

Investigating the genetic relationship between vitamin B12 deficiency and Parkinson’s disease

· 2025-01-02

DOI: 10.1101/2025.01.01.25319858

Check source for accessPreprintOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

Introduction Epidemiological studies suggest that patients with Parkinson’s disease (PD) may have lower levels of vitamin B12 compared to healthy controls, and it was proposed that PD patients could benefit from vitamin B12 supplementation. Functional studies have shown that B12 could modify LRRK2 activity and may directly interact with alpha-synuclein. This study aimed to investigate the role of common and rare variants in genes related to B12 metabolism and assess the potential causal relationships between B12 levels and PD risk, age-at-onset, and motor/cognitive progression. Methods We investigated the association between common and rare variants in genes involved in vitamin B12 metabolism. Rare variants (minor allele frequency Results Our analysis showed no associations between common variants of genes crucial in B12 metabolism and PD. Pathway PRS identified nominal association between B12-related genes and PD (OR = 1.061, 95% CI: 1.004–1.121, p = 0.038), which did not survive Bonferroni correction. In the rare variants analysis, we identified a significant association between variants with high CADD scores in the CUBN gene (P=6.07E-05; Pfdr=0.005) in the AMP-PD cohort, driven by the benign variant p.G3114S (OR=3.3; p=3.56E-05); however, this was not validated in the meta-analysis. We did not identify a potentially causal relationship between vitamin B12 levels and the risk, age-at-onset, or progression of PD. Additionally, no genetic correlation was observed between vitamin B12 and PD risk or age-at-onset GWASs. Conclusion Overall, our analyses indicate lack of genetic link between B12 levels or metabolism and PD.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.