SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Diversity of mitochondrial pathology in a mouse model of axonal degeneration in synucleinopathies.

Oxid Med Cell Longev · 2013-03-14

DOI: 10.1155/2013/817807PMID: 23577227

Open accessResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov't; research-article; Review; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

There is mounting evidence for a role of mitochondrial dysfunction in the pathogenesis of α -synucleinopathies such as Parkinson's disease (PD) and dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB). In particular, recent studies have demonstrated that failure of mitochondrial quality control caused by loss of function of the PTEN-induced kinase 1 (PINK1, PARK6) Parkin (PARK2) pathway may be causative in some familial PD. In sporadic PD, α -synuclein aggregation may interfere with mitochondrial function, and this might be further exacerbated by leucine-rich repeat kinase 2 (LRRK2). The majority of these findings have been obtained in Drosophila and cell cultures, whereas the objective of this paper is to discuss our recent results on the axonal pathology of brains derived from transgenic mice expressing α -synuclein or DLB-linked P123H β -synuclein. In line with the current view of the pathogenesis of sporadic PD, mitochondria abnormally accumulated in α -synuclein/LRRK2-immunopositive axonal swellings in mice expressing α -synuclein. Curiously, neither mitochondria nor LRRK2 was present in the swellings of mice expressing P123H β -synuclein, suggesting that α - and β -synuclein might play differential roles in the mitochondrial pathology of α -synucleinopathies.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.