SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Middle Cerebellar Peduncle Width-A Novel MRI Biomarker for FXTAS?

Front Neurosci · 2018-06-25

DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2018.00379PMID: 29988561

Open accessresearch-article; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

Fragile X-associated tremor/ataxia syndrome (FXTAS) is a severe neurodegenerative movement disorder affecting over 40% of male and 16% of female FMR1 premutation carriers over the age of 50. However, there is a lack of prognostic biomarkers to aid early diagnosis and treatment planning. Therefore, this study aimed to assess the utility of the Magnetic Resonance Parkinson Index (MRPI) as a potential MRI biomarker for FXTAS. The four measurements required for the MRPI were assessed in 45 male premutation carriers at risk of developing FXTAS (Mean age = 59.54 years), 53 male patients with FXTAS (Mean age = 66.16 years) and 61 male controls (Mean age = 60.75 years), of which 73 participants had follow-up visits on average 1.96 years later. Middle cerebellar peduncle (MCP) width as well as midbrain and pons cross-sectional area were reduced in patients with FXTAS compared to both premutation carriers without FXTAS and controls. While these measurements were not found to change over time in the three-group analysis, age was an important predictor of midbrain cross-sectional area and pons/midbrain ratio. MCP width was initially reduced in a subset of premutation carriers who developed FXTAS symptoms between their initial and follow-up visits, which also decreased between visits, compared to age-matched premutation carriers who did not show any FXTAS symptom development over time. Therefore, while the MPRI may not be a useful biomarker for FXTAS, decreased MCP width may be one of the first notable signs of FXTAS, and therefore the first biomarker with the potential to identify those most at risk for the disorder.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.