SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Genetic Variants Associated With Neurodegenerative Diseases Regulate Gene Expression in Immune Cell CD14+ Monocytes.

Front Genet · 2018-12-18

DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2018.00666PMID: 30619483

Open accessresearch-article; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

Until now, large-scale genome-wide association studies have identified 94 genes associated with Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease, and multiple sclerosis. Expression quantitative trait locus (eQTL) analysis showed that six genetic variants around six of these 94 genes could drive both disease susceptibility and altered expression of six nearby genes including CD33 (rs3865444), PILRB (rs1476679), NUP160 (rs10838725), LRRK2 (rs76904798), RGS1 (rs1323292), and METTL21B (rs701006). However, two of these six genetic variants rs1476679 and rs76904798 variants could regulate the expression of PILRB and LRRK2 only in the human monocyte-derived microglia-like (MDMi) cells, but not in human peripheral blood monocytes. Here, we aim to verify these findings using another two eQTL datasets in human peripheral blood immune cell CD14+ monocytes. The results that showed that rs1476679 and rs76904798 variants or their proxy variants could significantly regulate the expression of PILRB and LRRK2 in immune cell CD14+ monocytes and human peripheral blood. We believe that these findings provide important supplementary information about the regulatory mechanisms by which both variants influence PILRB and LRRK2 gene expression and neurodegenerative disease risk.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.