SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Hereditary Parkinson’s disease as a new clinical manifestation of the damaged POLG gene

Orv Hetil · 2020-05-01

DOI: 10.1556/650.2020.31724PMID: 32364361

Check source for accessJournal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

The protein product of the nuclear-encoded POLG gene plays a key role in the maintenance of mitochondrial DNA replication, and its failure causes multi-system diseases with varying severity. The clinical spectrum is extremely wide, and the most common symptoms include ptosis, myoclonus, epilepsy, myopathy, sensory ataxia, parkinsonism, cognitive decline and infertility. Now, it is known that mitochondrial dysfunction in Parkinson's disease plays a key role in the loss of dopaminergic neurons in the substantia nigra. Therefore, changes in the POLG gene may influence the development of various hereditary neurodegenerative diseases, including monogenic parkinsonism. However, only limited information is available on the relationship between Parkinson's disease and POLG gene and until now, there are no available data about the Hungarian population. In our study, we performed a next-generation sequencing study of 67 Hungarian patients with parkinsonism and analyzed the potentially damaging alterations in the POLG gene. 3 patients have been identified with a potential pathogen variant. In this study, we would like to call attention to the fact that during the differential diagnosis of parkinsonism, the possible involvement of POLG gene should be kept in mind. Especially in the presence of additional symptoms, such as ophthalmoparesis, non-vascular white matter lesions, psychiatric comorbidity, and relatively early age of onset, the POLG gene should be taken into consideration. Based on previous data from the literature and our own experience, we have summarized a possible diagnostic approach for POLG-associated parkinsonism. Orv Hetil. 2020; 161(20): 821-828.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.