SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Serum uric acid level as a putative biomarker in Parkinson's disease patients carrying GBA1 mutations: 2-Year data from the PPMI study.

Parkinsonism Relat Disord · 2021-01-20

DOI: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2020.12.020PMID: 33508700

Check source for accessResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov't; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

IntroductionBlood uric acid represents an important biomarker in sporadic Parkinson's disease (PD). Whether uric acid levels change in genetic forms of PD is beginning to be assessed. The aim of the present study was to evaluate differences in serum uric acid level among PD patients harboring mutations in the glucocerebrosidase (GBA1) gene, sporadic PD, and healthy controls followed longitudinally.MethodsLongitudinal 2-year serum uric acid measurement data of 120 GBA-PD patients have been downloaded from the Parkinson's Progression Markers Initiative (PPMI) database. This cohort was compared with 369 de novo sporadic PD patients and 195 healthy controls enrolled in the same study.ResultsFollowing adjustment for age, sex and BMI the GBA-PD cohort exhibited lower 2-year longitudinal uric acid level as compared to the controls (p = 0.016). Baseline uric acid measurements showed only a marginal difference (p = 0.119), but year 2 uric acid levels were lower in the GBA-PD cohort (p ConclusionsThis is the first study to assess serum uric acid in a GBA-PD cohort. Our findings suggest that low serum uric acid might be a progression biomarker in GBA-PD. However, more studies (ideally longitudinal) on the association between low serum uric acid and clinical data in GBA-PD are needed. These results are consistent with data from previous reports assessing uric acid as a biomarker in other genetic forms of PD.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.