SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Comparing the Clinical and Neuropsychological Characteristics of Parkinson's Disease With and Without Freezing of Gait.

Front Neurosci · 2021-04-27

DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2021.660340PMID: 33986641

Open accessresearch-article; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

IntroductionFreezing of gait (FOG) is one of the most common walking problems in Parkinson's disease (PD). Impaired cognitive function is believed to play an important role in developing and aggravating FOG in PD. But some evidence suggests that motor function discrepancy may affect testing results. Therefore, we think it is necessary for PD-FOG(+) and PD-FOG(-) patients to complete neuropsychological tests under similar motor conditions.MethodsThis study recruited 44 idiopathic PD patients [PD-FOG(+) n = 22, PD-FOG(-) n = 22] and 20 age-matched healthy controls (HC). PD-FOG(+) and PD-FOG(-) patients were matched for age, year of education, and Hoehn and Yahr score (H&Y). All participants underwent a comprehensive battery of neuropsychological assessment, and demographical and clinical information was also collected.ResultsPD patients showed poorer cognitive function, higher risks of depression and anxiety, and more neuropsychiatric symptoms compared with HC. When controlling for age, years of education, and H&Y, there were no statistical differences in cognitive function between PD-FOG(+) and PD-FOG(-) patients. But PD-FOG(+) patients had worse motor and non-motor symptoms than PD-FOG(-) patients. PD patients whose motor symptoms initiated with rigidity and initiated unilaterally were more likely to experience FOG.ConclusionTraditional neuropsychological testing may not be sensitive enough to detect cognitive impairment in PD. Motor symptoms initiated with rigidity and initiated unilaterally might be an important predictor of FOG.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.