SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Parkinson's Disease Subtyping Using Clinical Features and Biomarkers: Literature Review and Preliminary Study of Subtype Clustering.

Diagnostics (Basel) · 2022-01-04

DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics12010112PMID: 35054279

Open accessreview-article; Review; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

The second most common progressive neurodegenerative disorder, Parkinson's disease (PD), is characterized by a broad spectrum of symptoms that are associated with its progression. Several studies have attempted to classify PD according to its clinical manifestations and establish objective biomarkers for early diagnosis and for predicting the prognosis of the disease. Recent comprehensive research on the classification of PD using clinical phenotypes has included factors such as dominance, severity, and prognosis of motor and non-motor symptoms and biomarkers. Additionally, neuroimaging studies have attempted to reveal the pathological substrate for motor symptoms. Genetic and transcriptomic studies have contributed to our understanding of the underlying molecular pathogenic mechanisms and provided a basis for classifying PD. Moreover, an understanding of the heterogeneity of clinical manifestations in PD is required for a personalized medicine approach. Herein, we discuss the possible subtypes of PD based on clinical features, neuroimaging, and biomarkers for developing personalized medicine for PD. In addition, we conduct a preliminary clustering using gait features for subtyping PD. We believe that subtyping may facilitate the development of therapeutic strategies for PD.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.