Research overview
The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by
BackgroundErythrocytes contain most of the peripheral α-synuclein (α-syn), which is the key pathological molecular of α-synucleinopathies including Parkinson's disease (PD). Our objectives were to assess the efficiency of erythrocytic total and oligomeric α-syn levels as PD diagnostic biomarkers, and to identify the correlations between erythrocytic α-syn levels and physiological/psychiatrical assessment scales.MethodsHome-brewed electrochemiluminescence assays were applied to assess the concentrations of erythrocytic total and oligomeric α-syn levels in a cohort including 124 patients with PD and 79 healthy controls (HCs). The correlations between erythrocytic α-syn levels and clinical measurements were assessed using Spearman's rank test.ResultsBoth the erythrocytic total and oligomeric α-syn levels were significantly higher in PD patients than HCs. The biomarkers adjusted for age and sex discriminated PDs from HCs well with 80% sensitivity, 89% specificity and 79% sensitivity, 83% specificity, respectively. Combining erythrocytic total and oligomeric α-syn levels by using binary logistic regression analysis with the controlling of age and sex generated a factor discriminates PDs from HCs with 88% sensitivity and 85% specificity. The erythrocytic total but not oligomeric α-syn levels adjusted for age and sex significantly correlated with anxiety scales and the MDS-UPDRS III scales in PD patients, respectively.ConclusionWe showed the usefulness of erythrocytic total and oligomeric α-syn levels as biomarkers for PD. Our results also suggest the capability of erythrocytic α-syn as a potential pathological factor and therapeutic target for psychiatric symptoms in PD patients.
Scientific assessment
Research question
Assess the question within the original study’s scope.
Methods & sample
Check the source article for study design and sample details.
Key findings
An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.
Limitations
Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.
Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.