Research overview
The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by
Objective Cognition has been reported to be involved in patients with multiple system atrophy (MSA), although initially it was considered an exclusion in the diagnosis of MSA. We assessed cognition in these patients and compared it with age and education matched healthy controls and correlated with the gray matter volume using voxel-based morphometry (VBM). Materials and methods This was a prospective, case-control, single-center study. Thirty patients with MSA (20 MSA-C (cerebellar variant) and 10 MSA-P (Parkinsonian variant)) and 25 age- and educational level-matched healthy controls were included. All the patients and controls underwent detailed neuropsychological tests and MRI brain. A battery of neuropsychological tests like Stroop test, digit span forward and backward, digit symbol substitution time test, animal naming test, color trail test and auditory verbal learning test were used to assess the various domain of cognition, which include mainly attention, executive function, memory, new learning, mental and motor speed. The gray matter volume was determined using VBM and correlated with neuropsychological scores. Results Attention, execution, verbal and visual memory, verbal fluency, and new learning were impaired in patients with MSA. MSA-P had more impairment in motor and mental speed, working memory, executive functions, and focused attention compared to MSA-C. Patients with MSA-C had more impairment in new learning, immediate recall, verbal fluency, and sustained attention compared to MSA-P. However, it was not statistically significant. There was a significant correlation between the various cognitive domains and atrophy of frontotemporal cortical areas, insula, caudate, thalamus, and cerebellum. Conclusion Cognition is impaired in patients with MSA-C and MSA-P and is likely due to the neurodegenerative process involving the cortical and subcortical structures. Long-term follow-up studies are required to find out the progression of these cognitive changes.
Scientific assessment
Research question
Assess the question within the original study’s scope.
Methods & sample
Check the source article for study design and sample details.
Key findings
An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.
Limitations
Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.
Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.