Research overview
The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by
Atypical parkinsonisms (APs) are a group of diseases linked to tau pathology. These include progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP) and corticobasal degeneration (CBD). In the initial stages, these APs may have similar clinical manifestations to Parkinson's disease (PD) and other parkinsonisms: bradykinesia, postural instability, tremor, and cognitive decline. Because of this, one major hurdle is the accurate early diagnosis of APs. Recent advances in positron emission tomography (PET) radiotracer development have allowed for targeting pathological tau in Alzheimer's disease (AD). Currently, work is still in progress for identifying a first-in-class radiotracer for imaging tau in APs. In this review, we evaluate the literature on in vitro and in vivo testing of current tau PET radiotracers in APs. The tau PET tracers assessed include both first-generation tracers ([18F]AV-1451, [18F]FDDNP, [18F]THK derivatives, and [11C]PBB3) and second-generation tracers ([18F]PM-PBB3, [18F]PI-2620, [18F]RO-948, [18F]JNJ-067, [18F]MK-6240, and [18F]CBD-2115). Concerns regarding off-target binding to cerebral white matter and the basal ganglia are still prominent with first-generation tracers, but this seems to have been mediated in a handful of second-generation tracers, including [18F]PI-2620 and [18F]PM-PBB3. Additionally, these two tracers and [18F]MK-6240 show promising results for imaging PSP- and CBD-tau. Overall, [18F]AV-1451 is the most widely studied tracer but the mixed results regarding its efficacy for use in imaging AP-tau is a cause for concern moving forward. Instead, future work may benefit from focusing on the second-generation radiotracers which seem to have a higher specificity for AP-tau than those originally developed for imaging AD-tau.
Scientific assessment
Research question
Assess the question within the original study’s scope.
Methods & sample
Check the source article for study design and sample details.
Key findings
An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.
Limitations
Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.
Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.