Research overview
The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by
BackgroundAs the strongest prodromal marker of α-synuclein-specific neurodegeneration, idiopathic REM sleep behavior disorder (iRBD) is becoming a focus of interest in disease-modifying therapy. Idebenone has been widely portrayed as a potent antioxidant targeting mitochondrial dysfunction. Previous study has identified the effect of idebenone on Parkinson's disease with promising outcomes by regulating mitophagy. A novel indication of idebenone should be highlighted in iRBD population.MethodsThe EITRS study is a randomized, double-blind, multi-center clinical study assessing the efficacy and safety of idebenone in the treatment of iRBD into synucleinopathies. One hundred forty-two patients (aged 40-75 years old) with clinically diagnosed iRBD are planned to be recruited with 80% statistical power and randomly assigned to idebenone (30 mg each time, three times a day) or matching placebo orally for 5 years. The assessment of rating scales, blood testing and neuroimaging examinations will be conducted at baseline, the 1st, 3rd and 5th year of follow-up. The primary efficacy endpoint is the 5-year conversion rate in patients with iRBD. The secondary endpoint is the safety and tolerability of idebenone in the treatment of iRBD. The study has been launched in July 2020.DiscussionThis is the first prospective study designed to identify the efficacy and safety of idebenone on the treatment of iRBD into synucleinopathies. The current results are expected to promote the development of evidence-based recommendations for the management of patients with iRBD. Furthermore, we hope to provide insights on a possible disease-modifying approach with robust evidence.Trial registrationClinicaltrials.gov, identifier: NCT04534023.
Scientific assessment
Research question
Assess the question within the original study’s scope.
Methods & sample
Check the source article for study design and sample details.
Key findings
An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.
Limitations
Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.
Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.