SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Effects of Non-Immersive Virtual Reality and Video Games on Walking Speed in Parkinson Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

J Clin Med · 2022-11-08

DOI: 10.3390/jcm11226610PMID: 36431086

Open accessreview-article; Review; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

People with Parkinson disease suffer from a loss of dopaminergic neurons, which are involved in walking speed. Currently, virtual reality (VR) has emerged as a useful tool for the rehabilitation of people with neurological diseases, optimizing results in balance and gait. This review aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of VR or video games (through face-to-face sessions and not telerehabilitation) in improving walking speed and other spatio-temporal parameters of gait, balance, and quality of life in patients with Parkinson disease. A bibliographic search was carried out in the MEDLINE, Web of Science, Scopus, and PEDro databases. This systematic review adhered to the PRISMA guideline statement and was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42020180836). From a total of 119 records, 5 studies met the inclusion criteria for qualitative analysis, of which 3 contributed to the meta-analysis; inconclusive findings were found on gait speed, balance, and quality of life after the use of non-immersive VR systems face-to-face. A greater number of studies are necessary, with a greater number of participants, to differentiate between those VR specific systems (specifically designed for rehabilitation) from commercial video games, including immersive systems, and obtain more conclusive evidence. Furthermore, it would be interesting to compare the administration of this treatment in person versus its administration via telerehabilitation, which will help plan treatment programs.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.