SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

A meta-analysis of the diagnostic utility of biomarkers in cerebrospinal fluid in Parkinson's disease.

NPJ Parkinsons Dis · 2022-11-29

DOI: 10.1038/s41531-022-00431-7PMID: 36446820

Open accessresearch-article; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

Biomarkers play important roles in the diagnosis and differential diagnosis of Parkinson's disease (PD). Thus, we carried out a systematic review and meta-analysis evaluating the diagnostic utility of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers to distinguish PD from atypical parkinsonian syndromes (APSs) and controls. Data for PD and APS and controls were extracted from 123 studies that reported the concentration of CSF biomarkers. Comparisons were presented using pooled Hedges' g. Sources of heterogeneity were evaluated using meta-regression, and subgroup and sensitivity analyses. We found that compared with controls, PD patients had lower levels of amyloid beta 1-42, phosphorylated tau, total tau, total α-synuclein, Zn, DJ-1, and YKL-40, and higher levels of oligomeric and phosphorylated α-synuclein. Moreover, lower CSF levels of neurofilament light chain, t-tau, YKL-40, and C-reactive protein were found in PD patients compared to those with multiple system atrophy. PD patients also had lower levels of NFL and higher levels of Aβ42 compared with patients with progressive supranuclear palsy. Reduced levels of p-tau and t-tau and higher Aβ42 levels were found in PD patients compared with patients with dementia with Lewy bodies. Finally, reduced NFL levels were found in patients with PD compared with patients with cortical basal degeneration. Therefore, we believe that the combinations of t-α-syn, Aβ42, and NFL could be promising biomarkers for the differential diagnosis of PD and APSs.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.