NeuralCipher Research overview
The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by
The International Parkinson's and Movement Disorder Society (MDS) criteria for progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP) have broadened the clinical spectrum of the disease and established phenotypic characterization according to the predominant manifestation at onset. The objective of this study is to describe clinical/cognitive and imaging features of a monocentric cohort of PSP patients, highlighting different patterns of functional disability according to the assigned phenotype. We retrospectively reviewed clinical/imaging data of 53 PSP patients diagnosed with probable PSP according to the MDS criteria and 40 age/sex-matched healthy controls (HCs). Neurological/neuropsychological assessments were performed using standardized scales, as well as comprehensive magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) morphometric measurements. In our cohort, there were 24/53 PSP-RS (Richardson's syndrome), 13/53 PSP-P (Parkinsonism), 7/53 PSP-PGF (Progressive gait freezing), and 9/53 PSP-Cog (Cognitive impairment). PSP-Cog presented the worst motor profiles, the highest percentages of dementia and impaired functional autonomy; 4/9 PSP-Cog and 2/7 PSP-PGF died. PSP-P had the lowest motor/cognitive burden. All MRI parameters had good discriminative efficacy vs. HCs, with P/M 2.0 discriminating PSP-PGF from PSP-RS and PSP-Cog. We highlighted discrete clinical and imaging patterns that best characterize different PSP phenotypes. PSP-Cog and PSP-PGF/RS manifest greater incidence of dementia and motor disability, respectively, while PSP-P has a more benign course. The identification of different phenotypes may be the expression of different progression patterns requiring tailored approaches in terms of follow-up and treatment. These findings support the concept of discrete patterns of Tau pathology within the PSP spectrum and encourage research for phenotype-specific outcome measures.
Scientific assessment
Research question
Assess the question within the original study’s scope.
Methods & sample
Check the source article for study design and sample details.
Key findings
An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.
Limitations
Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.
Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.