SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Clinical Benefits of Therapeutic Interventions Targeting Mitochondria in Parkinson's Disease Patients.

CNS Neurol Disord Drug Targets · 2024-01-01

DOI: 10.2174/1871527322666230330122444PMID: 37005519

Open accessResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov't; review-article; Review; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

Parkinson's disease is the second most common neurodegenerative disease. Mitochondrial dysfunction has been associated with neurodegeneration in Parkinson's disease, and several treatments targeting mitochondria have been tested in these patients to delay disease progression and tackle disease symptoms. Herein, we review available data from randomised, double-blind clinical studies that have investigated the role of compounds targeting mitochondria in idiopathic Parkinson's disease patients, with a view of providing patients and clinicians with a comprehensive and practical paper that can inform therapeutic interventions in this group of people. A total of 9 compounds have been tested in randomized clinical trials, but only exenatide has shown some promising neuroprotective and symptomatic effects. However, whether this evidence can be translated into daily clinical practice still needs to be confirmed. In conclusion, targeting mitochondrial dysfunction in Parkinson's disease is a promising therapeutic approach, although only one compound has shown a positive effect on Parkinson's disease progression and symptoms. New compounds have been investigated in animal models, and their efficacy needs to be confirmed in humans through robust, randomised, double-blind clinical trials.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.