SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Computational models of autonomic regulation in gastric motility: Progress, challenges, and future directions.

Front Neurosci · 2023-03-15

DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2023.1146097PMID: 37008202

Open accessreview-article; Review; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

The stomach is extensively innervated by the vagus nerve and the enteric nervous system. The mechanisms through which this innervation affects gastric motility are being unraveled, motivating the first concerted steps towards the incorporation autonomic regulation into computational models of gastric motility. Computational modeling has been valuable in advancing clinical treatment of other organs, such as the heart. However, to date, computational models of gastric motility have made simplifying assumptions about the link between gastric electrophysiology and motility. Advances in experimental neuroscience mean that these assumptions can be reviewed, and detailed models of autonomic regulation can be incorporated into computational models. This review covers these advances, as well as a vision for the utility of computational models of gastric motility. Diseases of the nervous system, such as Parkinson's disease, can originate from the brain-gut axis and result in pathological gastric motility. Computational models are a valuable tool for understanding the mechanisms of disease and how treatment may affect gastric motility. This review also covers recent advances in experimental neuroscience that are fundamental to the development of physiology-driven computational models. A vision for the future of computational modeling of gastric motility is proposed and modeling approaches employed for existing mathematical models of autonomic regulation of other gastrointestinal organs and other organ systems are discussed.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.